Occasionally someone writes something so stupid that I honestly am tempted to buy a plane ticket to where ever they live just to have the pleasure of slapping them in the back of the head.

Such is the case with Chris Brogan's post on the whole Loren Feldman controversy (which I'm not going to rehash).  In his post he says...

That I’m not so sure about, and further, when you think about how one might patrol for such, I think free speech (not hate speech, but the other stuff that will get sucked into the nets) might get caught up, too.

* Pardon me as I take a deep breath before typing the rest of this post *

OK, here's the thing.  The people who protested Loren Feldman, the people who called him a racist, WOULD CATEGORIZE HIS VIDEO AS HATE SPEECH YOU DUM...

ok...one more moment...

Evaluating issues of morality (and legality as well though they are different things) requires you see things from outside your own limited perspective.  It means realizing that what you think defines something might not be what other people define it as. 

That's the point.

The reason the founders of our country (he's also American) didn't say something like "Free Speech unless its Hate Speech" is because they were wise enough to realize you can't do that without completely obliterating Free Speech.  Because everyone has a different definition of what speech is good and what speech is bad.

I tried desperately to keep my response civil but this type of thing is more dangerous than any racist could ever be.  People dismiss racists while the well intentioned can spout simple minded pronouncements to their heart's content.  Mark my words, if the world does end up heading towards the hell of a totalitarian society every brick on that road will be paved not by racists or other bad people but by well intentioned idiots who couldn't see beyond their own narrow frame of reference.