TomsTechBlog.com

Thoughts on IT, .Net, and everything else Tech

Real Time Media on the State of the Union

clock January 28, 2010 01:25 by author tom

Tad DeHaven of the Cato institute is my hero for today.  Throughout the Cato Institutes live blog of the State of the Union he was pulling quotes from previous SOTU addresses by George W. Bush in which Bush had said the exact same things.  I’ve always said the irony of liberals hating Bush and Conservatives hating Obama is that both basically pursued the exact same policies and this offers some proof of that.

So for those who have commented or e-mailed claiming I hate Real Time Media I post this to show I’m not against it (I’m just against those who think it’s a news source)

P.S.  For the record my favorite quote of the night came from Katherine Mangu-Ward of Reason.com who said…

I think they might be cheering for "pass[ing] the problem on to another generation of Americans"

(It’s funny because the timing of the applause made it seem like that was exactly what they were cheering for)



Ooops…

clock December 8, 2009 16:14 by author tom

Ever own a domain but accidentally leave the contact address as your hotmail account that you haven’t checked for years so the domain gets shut off for a morning because you bought a two year renewal and forgot when that renewal was due?  Yeah, I hate when that happens.



Heading For Vegas (the definition of a useless post)

clock December 3, 2009 21:47 by author tom

After falling off the blogging wagon a bit I’ve committed myself to updating at least every 4 days no matter what.  But the next 4 days are going to be pretty busy so I’m updating now.  Unfortunately my focus is decidedly  un-tech right now.

That’s because tonight I’m headed to the opening of Crystals at CityCenter.  For those not familiar CityCenter is a huge complex located on the Las Vegas Strip.  Once the construction is finished it will include a “City in a City” with several resorts, casinos and a shopping mall (Crystals is the shopping center and the first real component of CityCenter to open to the general public)

If you can’t already tell, I’m a bit obsessed with the project.

You see, CityCenter will also feature actual condos that are billed as “having all the amenities of a Las Vegas Hotel” (along with VIP access to the actual MGM Hotel and Casino).  The moment I heard that I wanted one.  Badly.

It is quite literally the stupidest idea I’ve ever had.  It would take every cent I’ve got AND I’d have to either move there or pay a huge sum of money for a Condo I don’t live in.  Beyond that I’d have to give up my job and start consulting full time (or find some other high paying vocation).  All for a living space less than half the size of where I live now.

But I REALLY want to do it.  I grew up in the government funded housing of Las Vegas (a.k.a. “The Projects” in TV vernacular).  This creates an odd situation because I love the city of Las Vegas but actually couldn’t go back to living anywhere near my childhood home even if I wanted to.  Living in a Condo actually located on the Strip would be perfect.

Anyway the chance to live in one is thankfully still in the future so for right now I’ll content myself with sign seeing in the shopping mall (along with a late Dinner with some old friends).  



On Not Posting...

clock November 9, 2009 01:31 by author Tom

So I haven't posted to this blog much lately.

At first I thought it was me. I've been really busy at work lately and the Holidays are coming up which presents an extra push for me (I tend to work a normal schedule during the Holidays as opposed to my normal 65 hour week so I have to work a little extra hard in preparation) But then I made a point of forcing myself to write on the next topic I found interesting.

And...nothing came along.

I don't know if it's the recession or if it's just a slow period but there just isn't a lot for me to post on. Most of what's going on in the tech blogosphere has boiled down to a few basic concepts...

  • Pre-Release products we know nothing about (Apple Tablet, Next Gen iPhone, CrunchPad and Android up until it was announced)
  • Personality Clashes with no philosophical issue at their root (see the most recent dustup with Michael Arrington and Zynga)
  • Posts that stretch out a simple point into multiple pages worth of posts (Yes, Google Wave is a little confusing but I don't think that trait justifies 4 or 5 posts)
  • Fluff Pieces (Why Facekbook will rule the Internet, 30 Predictions for Twitter's Future, etc...)

Honestly I don't know how to comment on any of those things. Which is why the blog's been dead lately. Hence this post. I'll be the first to admit this post is largely just a sign post for this blog saying "Hey look, this isn't an abandon Blog". For those who e-mailed thanks for the concern (and for reading at all which is humbling in itself)

I'll be around (hopefully more often) in the future.



The Sidekick Users Strike Back (a.k.a. Tom’s a Big Meanie)

clock October 16, 2009 03:18 by author tom

First let me say this.  If you haven’t either told me to “Go F**k Myself” or thought of telling me to “Go F**k Myself” at some point in the last 48 hours than this post doesn’t really apply to you.  You should feel free to skip it. 

To the rest of you (who probably aren’t reading this but what the heck) I have a message.  In order to frame that message I would like to quote one of the lovely messages I’ve received over the past day.  It said…

Hey F**k w*d,

Why don’t you mind your own F**k**g busines (her mis-spell, not mine - tom).  Some of us are really upset about losing all our data and we don’t need you telling us you don’t give a c**p about it.  Why don’t you just leave us alone and not be a j**k*ss about things.

Some people actually care about other people’s suffering but clearly you don’t so why don’t you just live your d**n life already and let us live ours. 

With hopes that you go f**k yourself,

[Name Withheld]

In fairness I was the one who withheld her name.  She was brave enough to put it out there with her real e-mail address (which was valid, I checked).  So kudos to her on that.

That said here’s my message to the author and everyone else who wrote similar ones: I think you missed the point.  To save myself from having to type any more than I have to and to prove I’m not back tracking I’m going to quote from the FAQ on my “about page” to make my point…

===Begin Quote===

“Why are you so mean? I don’t think I am mean but I know where the sentiment comes from.

Here’s the thing, I can be hard on people from time to time but that’s because I actually do care. It’s easy to just say “you’re great” to a person and then go on your way but to me that’s dishonest. That’s really saying “it doesn’t matter what you do it’s of so little importance that I’m just going to tell you how great you are no matter what”

I believe what people do is important and I believe that I have an obligation to tell them when their actions don’t deliver the results that their words are intending.   So I'm not going to tell you how great you are unless you actually ARE great but I am willing to do everything in my power to help make you great.  That's the sentiment I live by.

If that makes me look mean then so be it. I’d rather look mean and be comforted by the fact that I did the right thing than look nice and be the guy who just doesn’t give a damn. 

===End Quote===

And that is what I say to you.  Believe it or not, I am the one who “gives a f**k” about your suffering.  I am the one who is trying to make you see that you made a mistake so that you won’t do it again.  The folks who are out there telling you it’s all big, mean Microsoft’s fault for losing your data are the ones that don’t care whether this happens to you again (and if you continue to not back up your data it will in fact happen to you again)

Sure, I’ll be the first to admit to the character flaw that is sarcasm and I’ll absolutely agree that my message would get across clearer without the sarcastic title.  But that’s the world.  No one’s perfect.  That shouldn’t stop you from thinking through what I said and realizing I was trying to help you.

So in closing, and I say this with all the love in the world, but if you can’t see that I’m trying to help you than you can go f**k yourself.  But I mean that in the nicest way possible.



Drama 2 Where R U?

clock October 4, 2009 18:21 by author Tom

When I started this blog I intended it to be a technical one.  Not "commentary on the day's tech events" which is what it has become.  The reason for the evolution was largely based on my admiration of two bloggers in particular.  Drama2 of the Drama 2.0 show and Loren Feldman of 1938 Media.  These two defied the blogosphere's group think and, imho, told it like it was.  So they've always been very important figures in my blogging life.

Six months ago today one of them disappeared.

Actually "disappeared" doesn't quite do the incident justice.  After a bizarre Twitter post on April 4th the Drama 2.0 web site changed dramatically.  The next day's post was entitled "Kim Kardashian vs. Lamborghini: Who Has the Smoothest Ride?" and the site's header had changed to feature porn pictures mixed in with provocative celebrity shots.  It now sported the tagline "Celebrity drama has never been this sexy" and was written by "nikolay" whoever that is.

For the next week items popped up regularly sporting headlines like "Lady Gaga Has An Ass To Go Gaga Over" and "Spencer Pratt Pumps Gas Before Pumping Heidi Montag".  This continued just long enough to confirm this was no prank on Drama2's part.   

Then, in another bizarre twist, the site went dark.  The next post appeared about 6 weeks later on May 28th and proclaimed "[Cameron] Diaz doesn’t have the freshest face" but "that doesn't mean she looks bad from the back".  Since that cutting edge news item the site has only managed to put up 3 more posts (though  bizarrely the last item was posted a mere 3 days ago so it's still active to some extent)

In the end a site with one of the best contrarian bloggers on the web has now become a half ass celebrity site that posts once a month or so. 

Why I still don't know (and if Google is to be believed neither does anyone else).  Since Drama2 was anonymous there's not really a way to track him down.  Even if there was he clearly doesn't want to be found and has clearly chosen not to explain his actions.

The sad part is Drama2's still proving his worth to this day.  With one exception his "2009 Predictions" have been eerily accurate so far.  I don't think I'm going out on a limb when I say keen insight like that is worth far more than yet another place to get a video of Kim Kardashian having sex (I know there are at least several thousand people out there who agree with me)

I'm not as high profile as Drama2 was nor am I as talented yet I've taken a good share of verbal beatings on this blog.  I assume he saw even worse and I have to imagine that was part of the reason he disappeared from "the scene" (though this post makes me wonder if that's true).  But it's sad because the blog world desperately needs him.  Anyone who has taken an anthropology class will tell you most people line up behind the loudest voice which leads to a system of group think based around the most powerful people in a social structure. 

No where is that more evident than in the blogosphere which means no group needs a talented contrarian more desperately than the tech blogs.  I don't know where  Drama2 went or if he still keeps up with tech blogs but if he should ever come across this I hope he knows  how much the blogoshphere has lost without him and how many of us out here still hope for his eventual return.



Where’ve You Been?

clock September 4, 2009 15:25 by author tom

Sorry for the unexpected hiatus.  Honestly we’ve been having, on average, “106 degree high” days while at the same time there are fires burning all around meaning there’s all kinds of bad junk in the air.  Plus I’ve been fairly busy at work AND trying to plan the coming weekend.  Bottom line: It hasn’t been an environment that’s conducive to sitting down and putting together organized thoughts. 



I'm Sorry To Go So Far Off The Rails, But This Is Important...

clock August 26, 2009 05:57 by author Tom

I apologize for this post.  This is so far out of the scope of this blog it's not even funny.  If I could stop myself from posting it I would.

But I can't let this stand and I had to put my reaction somewhere.  For those who don't know Senator Ted Kennedy has died.  Many are posting blog entries mourning his death.  Even some conservative sources, whose politics were the complete opposite of his, are chiming in with condolences.

None of this mourning is deserved.  This has nothing to do with politics.  This has everything to do with the fact that he killed a woman.  That shouldn't be forgotten.  She shouldn't be forgotten.  So I'm going to tell the story and for those who think it's crass to speak badly of the dead I apologize in advance.  But I can't let this man be lionized and no say anything.

For those who don't already know what I'm talking about here's the story.  At age 37 Ted Kennedy was running for re-election to his senate seat.  He offered to give one of the young women on his staff, Mary Jo Kopechne, a ride. 

I'm going to tell the story through quotes from here on out.  These quotes are from the Wikipedia entry on the incident

According to his own testimony at the inquest into Kopechne's death, Kennedy left the party at "approximately 11:15 p.m." When he announced that he was about to leave, Kopechne indicated "that she was desirous of leaving, if I would be kind enough to drop her back at her hotel".

...

Christopher "Huck" Look was a deputy sheriff working as a special police officer at the Edgartown regatta dance that night. At 12:30 am he left the dance, crossed over to Chappaquiddick in the yacht club's launch, got into his parked car and drove home. He testified that between 12:30 and 12:45 am he had seen a dark car containing a man driving and a woman in the front seat approaching the intersection with Dike Road. The car had gone first onto the private Cemetery Road and stopped there. Thinking that the occupants of the car might be lost, Look had gotten out of his car and walked towards it. When he was 25 to 30 feet away, the car started backing up towards him. When Look called out to offer his help, the car took off down Dike Road in a cloud of dust.[5] Look recalled that the car's license plate began with a "L" and contained the number "7" twice, both details true of Kennedy's 1967Oldsmobile Delmont 88.

So Sen. Kennedy was clearly disoriented after coming from a party.  If you ask me it sounds a lot like he was drunk.

According to his inquest testimony, Kennedy made a wrong turn onto Dike Road, an unlit dirt road that led to Dike Bridge (also spelled Dyke Bridge). Dike Road was unpaved, but Kennedy, driving at "approximately twenty miles an hour", took "no particular notice" of this fact, and did not realize that he was no longer headed towards the ferry landing.

Again, have you ever seen a sober person not realize they'd gone from a paved road to an unpaved road? 

Dike Bridge was a wooden bridge angled obliquely to the road with no guardrail. A fraction of a second before he reached the bridge, Kennedy applied his brakes; he then drove over the side of the bridge. The car plunged into tide-swept Poucha Pond (at that location a channel) and came to rest upside down underwater. Kennedy later recalled that he was able to swim free of the vehicle, but Kopechne was not. Kennedy claimed at the inquest that he called Kopechne's name several times from the shore, then tried to swim down to reach her seven or eight times, then rested on the bank for around fifteen minutes before returning on foot to Lawrence Cottage, where the party attended by Kopechne and other "Boiler Room Girls" had occurred. Kennedy denied seeing any house with a light on during his journey back to Lawrence Cottage.

In addition to the working telephone at the Lawrence Cottage, according to one commentator, his route back to the cottage would have taken him past four houses from which he could have telephoned and summoned help; however, he did not do so. The first of those houses, referred to as "Dike House", was only 150 yards away from the bridge, and was occupied by Sylvia Malm and her family at the time of the incident. Malm later stated that she had left a light on at the residence when she retired for that evening.

So this woman is drowning and he decides to walk back to the party passing several houses that he could have stopped at to call the police.  He instead chose to go get two friends.  After they could not help he assured them he would call the authorities.  This is what he did instead...

According to his own testimony, Kennedy swam across the 500-foot channel, back to Edgartown and returned to his hotel room, where he removed his clothes and collapsed on his bed. Hearing noises, he later put on dry clothes and asked someone what the time was: it was something like 2:30 a.m., the senator recalled. He testified that, as the night went on, "I almost tossed and turned and walked around that room ... I had not given up hope all night long that, by some miracle, Mary Jo would have escaped from the car."

Back at his hotel, Kennedy complained at 2:55 am to the hotel owner that he had been awoken by a noisy party.

So again, having not called the authorities he had the presence of mind to complain to the Hotel management about a noisy party keeping him awake.  Which brings us to the next morning.

By 7:30 am the next morning he was talking "casually" to the winner of the previous day's sailing race, with no indication that anything was amiss.  At 8 a.m., Gargan and Markham joined Kennedy at his hotel where they had a "heated conversation." According to Kennedy's testimony, the two men asked why he hadn't reported the accident. Kennedy responded by telling them "about my own thoughts and feelings as I swam across that channel ... that somehow when they arrived in the morning that they were going to say that Mary Jo was still alive".[The three men subsequently crossed back to Chappaquiddick Island on the ferry, where Kennedy made a series of phone calls from a payphone by the crossing to his friends for advice; he again did not report the accident to authorities.

So by the next morning not only has he not contacted the authorities but  he's going on with his normal daily routine as if nothing happened.  When confronted by the friends who he told he'd contact the authorities he still doesn't do it but instead chooses to call around asking for "advice" on whether he should contact the authorities at all.

The truth is we'll never know if he would have ever contacted the authorities because...

Earlier that morning, two amateur fishermen had seen the overturned car in the water and notified the inhabitants of the nearest cottage to the pond, who called the authorities at around 8:20 am.A diver was sent down and discovered Kopechne's body at around 8:45 am.

So had these fisherman not found the body who knows what would have happened.  But this last quote is the most important one of all.

The diver, John Farrar, later testified at the inquest that Kopechne's body was pressed up in the car in the spot where an air bubble would have formed. He interpreted this to mean that Kopechne had survived for a while after the initial accident in the air bubble, and concluded that...

"Had I received a call within five to ten minutes of the accident occurring, and was able, as I was the following morning, to be at the victim's side within twenty-five minutes of receiving the call, in such event there is a strong possibility that she would have been alive on removal from the submerged car"

So had Kennedy immediately contacted the authorities there's a good chance the girl would have lived.  Given all that you have to ask how this man is still a Senator.  The answer: He has a powerful family.  In the end he was charged with leaving the scene of an accident and was given the minimum (a 2 month prison sentence) that was then suspended by the judge (so he essentially wasn't punished at all). 

One final note.  An independent inquest into the incident took place afterward and was presided over by Judge James Boyle.  He determined that what Kennedy did fit the charge of manslaughter (at the least).  But...

Under Massachusetts law Boyle, having found "probable cause" that Kennedy had committed a crime, could have issued a warrant for his arrest, but he did not do so.  District Attorney Dinis chose not to pursue Kennedy for manslaughter, despite Judge Boyle's conclusions.

The Kopechne family did not bring any legal action against Senator Kennedy, but they did receive a payment of $90,904 from the Senator personally and $50,000 from his insurance company. The Kopechnes later explained their decision to not take legal action by saying that "We figured that people would think we were looking for blood money."

Again, I apologize for this post.  But I just couldn't let this "outpouring of grief" for the man stand.  No matter how you feel about his politics, his legislative record, etc... it shouldn't make a difference.  No amount of good deeds makes you entitled to one free killing of an innocent person. 



My New Favorite Quote (At Least For Today)

clock August 12, 2009 04:43 by author Tom

The owner of favstar.fm posted an item on Hacker News asking for advice on monetization.  In checking out his site I found this quote and it just cracked me up...

"I was halfway through the appendectomy when I realized that Wikipedia was full of shit."  -  fireland



How Unjust Laws Might Help and Hacker News Might Hurt Society

clock August 8, 2009 16:28 by author Tom

The was originally posted on Hacker News but it got deleted for reasons I don't entirely understand.  Despite what the title says I was neither suggesting we accept unjust laws or get rid of HN as you'll see below.  But it was killed none the less and I can accept that.

It's funny how, after we've aged a bit, we choose to let certain things go.  A younger me probably would have been all over the site demanding an explanation for the perceived censorship while the older me simply sees it as someone keeping their house in order as they see fit.

But not even the older me would want to see the work go to waste.  So I'm posting it here. 

(NOTE: Seconds after I posted this it came back so maybe it was just a triage sort of thing.  But now as I'm looking it didn't really because I can't reply to the people who replied to me (which I can do even when an article's been killed).  I don't know.  It's all very weird.  I'm choosing to go with the flow)

This all came about after I commented on an article where a 17 year old got put on the sexual predators watch list for having sexual relations with a 15 year old at her high school (since she was considered an adult at 17 and he was not). The majority opinion of the other comments was this was a disgusting abuse (I don’t disagree) but I made this point in response…

Let me explain my point. Politicians often aren’t the brightest bulbs in the set. They are people who can convince a lot of other people to like them which makes most the equivalent of good con men. So after they’re elected they tend not to think things through and make simplistic laws like “Any adult performing any sex act on a minor is guilty” (which of course ignores the 17 year old having consensual sex with the 15 year old in high school). But there are checks on a law’s power. Cops and Judges both have discretion for this very reason. But sometimes the system fails and you get lazy cops, a lazy judge and a lazy prosecutor who all don’t care enough to do their job. Then you end up with the situation quoted in the first part of this article.

 

But here’s the thing: Yes, I think it’s unjust and I think the politicians, lawyer, judge, cops, etc... in this story are all deplorable fools. But the world will always have deplorable fools and only when someone’s burned by them do the rest of us realize something’s wrong so we can fix it. As the article points out the law that got this woman into trouble no longer exists because people saw the abuse and demanded it be changed.

But as I looked at it I think I was wrong. In the end unjust laws ARE inherent in a democratic system. As long as our elected officials are judged more on likability than they are on intelligence there will be poorly conceived laws that hurt innocent people. But is that a necessary evil? It isn’t like Politicians are the only ones who can convince the masses of anything.

Which brings me back to Hacker News.

I love Hacker News. When I say it “might hurt society” I’m not suggesting it go anywhere. If it did I’d be devastated. But I think everyone here has to ask themselves if we’re part of the problem. More and more you see the intelligent people of the world seeking refuge with the likeminded. I think most of us who visit HN regularly are here because we’ve been turned off by the idiots in other forums. But those idiots have a vote in our election system and if those idiots can be made to see that certain laws are ill-conceived than maybe…just maybe…no one will have to have their life ruined by a stupid law.

To me HN, and sites like it, are like alcohol. They're a wonderful release that make life tolerable. But just as you can’t stay drunk all the time I think we all need to accept we can’t hide in here (or in other places with likeminded individuals). I think it’s our duty to go out and preach “rationality to the heathens” if you will. Only then will we be fulfilling our responsibility to society.

Or at least, that’s my 2 cents.



About Me

Hi, I’m Tom and I run the IT department for a non-profit agency which provides treatment to special-needs children. Though I will (like any blogger) comment on technology in general my main goal is to detail how I’m trying to use technology to help treat the children we serve and its my hope that blogging will allow me to connect with people who can help in that goal.

More...

Contact

- E-Mail Tom

Search

Subscribe

- Subscribe to this Blog

Calendar

<<  March 2010  >>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

Archive

Tags

Categories


Blogroll

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    © Copyright 2010

    Sign in