TomsTechBlog.com

Thoughts on IT, .Net, and everything else Tech

iPhone 3G vs. Blackberry: A Reality Check

clock June 10, 2008 17:24 by author Tom

As yesterday surely proves, I am an iPhone fan.  A "dyed in the wool bought a Macbook and am learning a new programming environment just to develop for it going to buy the 3G version even though I have absolutely no need for it" fanboy. 

But I also own a Blackberry which is why I had to roll my eyes at Don Reisinger's post entitled "Apple may have killed the Blackberry".  In it he says...

But then, in a moment of pure triumph, Steve walked onto the stage and unveiled the new 3G iPhone.

Sure, it was exactly what we expected (minus the MMS), but it also was a call to arms. Instead of maintaining its status as the consumer's cell phone, the iPhone is now the every-person's cell phone and has RIM firmly centered in its sights.

RIM may be the leader in the enterprise market right now and companies like Microsoft will constantly claim that they can hold their own, but rest assured that this is a two horse race. And although the BlackBerry has led the way, Steve Jobs just dealt a decisive blow that will not only force RIM to capitulate, but could see the end of the BlackBerry line altogether.

Over react much?  A few things to remember...

  • Blackberry has had GPS for years and the iPhone still doesn't offer turn-by-turn directions which, again, has been in the Blackberry for years
  • Blackberry supports cut and paste which is a big thing when you are trying to do business on the road and interact with two different colleagues about the same issue (or any number of other scenarios for that matter)
  • Blackberry has a built in "To Do List/Task Manager" application that syncs with Exchange.  iPhone does not. 
  • Battery life is much better on pretty much any Blackberry and that is of the utmost importance for a business user
  • Blackberry's come with REMOVABLE BATTERIES.  Most business people I know carry around a spare.
  • Blackberry supports MMS (which I would assume is of almost no use to business users but still deserves a mention)
  • Blackberry's support Video recording
  • Almost all Blackberry's have better cameras (same 2 MP but with 5x Zoom)
  • Almost all Blackberry's come with MicroSD slots
  • Blackberry's sync technology is more mature.  Assuming the iPhone is using ActiveSync which is licensed from Microsoft I can personally attest to the Blackberry  having better sync capabilities. 
  • Blackberry has an excellent search function (which is paticularly good at searching through e-mail but can search the whole device if you need it).  iPhone has none.
  • Blackberry's support voice dialing, iPhones do not (though I've never been a fan of the feature)
  • Blackberry's allow you to record quick voice notes, the iPhone doesn't (very important to a lot of business users)
  • iPhone's bluetooth capabilities are crippled by Apple so that you can only use an ear piece.  Blackberry can use any Bluetooth device and supports stereo sound
  • Blackberry's can be used as a tethered 3G Modem for a laptop, the iPhone can not
  • Blackberry is easier to use as a phone (iPhone takes several screen clicks to get to Spearker for example while Blackberry has one hardware button)
  • From what I can tell, the iPhone can't be locked down by administrators in the same way a Blackberry can
  • The iPhone offers nothing (enterprise feature wise) above and beyond what a Blackberry can do.  Organizations with a Blackberry infrastructure already paid for aren't going to switch to something that doesn't improve on anything just to use iPhones (believe it or not most companies would prefer their employees not have great web access on the road)

and the biggest point of them all...

  • Most Blackberry users use their phone for e-mail 95% of the time and the iPhone's soft keyboard is vastly inferior to every Blackberry I've ever seen. 

Beyond that I have to say that the Blackberry has a lot of fine tuning that the iPhone still lacks.  One example: unless you purposely choose to turn the feature off the Blackberry alarm will sound even if the phone is turned off.  For a business person using their phone as their alarm clock that sort of thing matters and little things like that are what make the Blackberry better suited for business users. 

In the end, the iPhone is trying to serve two masters (business and casual users) while the Blackberry is only interested in one.  For that reason the Blackberry will probably always be a better business choice (at least until there's an "iPhone Business Edition" from Apple)



The Dual Demons of Apple's Past

clock June 10, 2008 05:12 by author Tom

Now that the "fan-boy-itis" has begun to pass I've been thinking of exactly why yesterday's announcement was such a let down.   I started to think about Steve Jobs and Apple in general and what I realized was that yesterday showed the signs of two disastrous traits from the past.

These two traits, or "demons" as I refer to them below, are probably all that stands in the way of Apple dominating the mobile field at this point.

Demon #1: Over engineering to the point of detriment

There's a famous story of Steve Jobs' time at NeXT.  Apparently he invited a reporter to NeXT headquarters for an interview.  At this point NeXT had not introduced a PC yet and everyone was beyond anxious.  When the reporter arrived they saw a PC looking object with a cloth covering it and assumed they'd be treated to a first look at the long awaited NeXT PC.

When Jobs eventually arrived and lifted the cloth what was under it was not a PC but just a monitor.  A beautiful monitor, a near perfect monitor, but nothing more.  According to the reporter Jobs went on and on about the monitor and how they had engineered it to be the perfect monitor.  But in the end all that bravado hid the sad truth that NeXT had put so many resources into over engineering the thing to perfection that they were no where near having a working PC.

They never did manage to produce a PC in the time frame they needed to.  Had Apple not bought them for their OS NeXT would have been a complete failure because of that. 

Why this should give people pause: Jobs' crowing over how the 3G and GPS chips were fit into the iPhone without increasing the size was just the NeXT monitor all over again.  I have no doubt there was some amazing and very time consuming engineering behind that accomplishment.  The question is whether that was the best use of Apple's resources and if anyone would care that the phone was 1/4 of an inch thicker than the original.  Because I suspect that other things got the shaft because of that feat of engineering. 

Demon #2: Leap and then take a break

Of course the classic Apple story is of the original MacOS.  Years ahead of anyone when it came out Apple never managed to create a successor to it.  They engineered three separate OS systems as possible replacements but never managed to get one out the door (Ironically that is what eventually brought Jobs' back into the fold when Apple bought NeXT for the OS). 

This all comes back to a fatal flaw that Apple employees always seem to have which is arrogance.  They are the best at what they do in many ways but they tend to think they're even better than they are which leads them to not compete as fiercely as they could.

Why this should give people pause: A year later Apple has given us access to some things we didn't have initially (the SDK) but doesn't appear to have added much of anything.  Things like Exchange support were the result of a Microsoft licensing agreement so you can't really give them credit for that.  In truth the iPhone has been at a stand still while Nokia, Google and even Microsoft have all rushed to incorporate its advances into their own platforms. 

With that said...

The above is one side of the story.  The other side of the story is that the Steve Jobs and the Apple of today are probably worlds different from the ones featured in the above stories.  For Jobs part he has so far successfully shown he can lead Apple without the destructive quirks that did him in the first time around.  On Apple's part the MacOS debacle was in large part due to then CEO John Sculley not feeling confident enough to lead engineering staff (a problem Steve Jobs certainly doesn't have)

But as I read the parade of ridiculous hands-on tests where each author tries desperately to find something to say about an iPhone that is essentially identical to its predecessor I can't help but think of the above two items and wonder if Apple's bad angels are finally catching up to it. 



About Me

Hi, I’m Tom and I run the IT department for a non-profit agency which provides treatment to special-needs children. Though I will (like any blogger) comment on technology in general my main goal is to detail how I’m trying to use technology to help treat the children we serve and its my hope that blogging will allow me to connect with people who can help in that goal.

More...

Contact

- E-Mail Tom

Search

Subscribe

- Subscribe to this Blog

Calendar

<<  June 2008  >>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Archive

Tags

Categories


Blogroll

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    © Copyright 2008

    Sign in